摘要:這個(gè)研究上周在《心理學(xué)美學(xué)》、《創(chuàng)造》和《藝術(shù)》等雜志期刊上發(fā)表過(guò)。研究中，作者稱(chēng)看一些像《廣告狂人》和《白宮風(fēng)云》等美劇電視劇能夠提高人的情緒感知力。即，看一些優(yōu)質(zhì)電視劇能夠讓你對(duì)事物更加地感同身受。快來(lái)看看美劇吧,它能讓你變得更好!

　　If you ever feel vaguely guilty about the vast amounts of television you watch, might I suggest you cling to the findings of this study, published last week in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. In it, the authors claim that watching high-quality television dramas —things like Mad Men or The West Wing —can increase your emotional intelligence. That is, watching good TV makes you moreempathetic.

　　如果你曾因看過(guò)巨多電視劇而有那么些許的愧疚，那我就要建議你去參考下這項(xiàng)研究的結(jié)果了。該研究上周在《心理學(xué)美學(xué)》、《創(chuàng)造》和《藝術(shù)》等雜志期刊上發(fā)表過(guò)。研究中，作者稱(chēng)看一些像《廣告狂人》和《白宮風(fēng)云》等電視劇能夠提高人的情緒感知力。即，看一些優(yōu)質(zhì)電視劇能夠讓你對(duì)事物更加地感同身受。

　　In the paper, the authors describe two experiments. In one, they asked about 100 people to first watch either a television drama (Mad Men or The West Wing) or a nonfiction program (How the Universe Works or Shark Week: Jaws Strikes Back). Afterward, all of the participants took a test psychologists often use to measure emotional intelligence: They're shown 36 pairs of eyes and are told to judge the emotion each pair is displaying. The results showed that the people who'd watched the fictionalized shows did better on this test than those who watched the nonfiction ones.

　　文中，作者描述了兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)。在一組實(shí)驗(yàn)中，主辦者先讓100個(gè)人看電視劇(《廣告狂人》或者是《白宮風(fēng)云》)或者是紀(jì)實(shí)節(jié)目(《宇宙解碼》或者是鯊魚(yú)周：鱷反擊)。之后所有的參與者進(jìn)行了一下測(cè)試，通常心理學(xué)家用這種測(cè)試測(cè)量情緒感知：測(cè)試者會(huì)看到36對(duì)眼睛，并要求判斷每雙眼睛中表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的情緒。結(jié)果顯示，測(cè)試中看虛構(gòu)電視劇的試驗(yàn)者比看紀(jì)實(shí)節(jié)目的測(cè)試者表現(xiàn)更好。

　　It's a similar finding to a widely reported 2013 study that claimed that reading literary fiction is linked to better scores on this empathy-measuring test. The authors of that study and this new one argue that a complex fictional narrative forces the reader or viewer to consider a problem from multiple perspectives; further, since not every character's emotion is explicitly spelled out, the audience must do some mental work to fill in those gaps, making a guess at the inner lives of the character.

　　這與2013年廣泛報(bào)道的一項(xiàng)發(fā)現(xiàn)極為相似，2013年的研究稱(chēng)，閱讀文學(xué)小說(shuō)能夠使人們?cè)诟行詼y(cè)試中獲得較高的分?jǐn)?shù)。該項(xiàng)研究的作者與此項(xiàng)新研究的作者稱(chēng)：復(fù)雜的虛構(gòu)讀物能夠強(qiáng)迫讀者或觀(guān)眾從多方面考慮問(wèn)題;而且，由于不是每個(gè)角色的情緒都會(huì)很明確地表達(dá)出來(lái)，觀(guān)眾們就要思考以填補(bǔ)這些空缺，揣度人物角色的內(nèi)心世界。